linda mccartney and other saints
warning: i am just a wee bit cranky today. approach accordingly.
i am currently listening to the biography of linda mccartney by longtime friend danny fields. somehow, my library doesn't carry the book but does carry the 9-CD audio book (read by someone who apparently hated the project, as now the only person credited reading it is that old pseudonym, alan smithee.)
i must confess that i always wondered a bit about the ever-shy linda's life. i am only up at 1969, so there is a whole lot i have not heard yet. that being said, i have learned that linda apparently fell into the line of photography, initially spreading a rumor that she was heir to the eastman-kodak fortune to propel her credibility as a photog (and then vigorously denying it for the rest of her days). no doubt, her photos of some of the most fascinating artists of the 1960s and beyond eerily spear you upon viewing. but there are so many things that i am finding irritatingly cloying.
1) what an AMAZING mother she was, field says over and over. that well may be. but what mother leaves their 5 year old child for months while carrying on a love affair?
2) how EVERYONE loved sitting for her photos. considering how many of these people she allegedly slept with, it is no wonder that they liked posing for her. fields seems to think that, oh, it was the 60s, everyone did this sort of thing. but where i come from, this is still known as sleeping your way to the top. or starfucking.
3) how she never tried to ensnare Beatle Paul. please. how many times does fields mention how she says to her close friends, “i'm going to marry a Beatle”? this was one highly intelligent lady, not some googly groupie.
i don't know why i am feeling so evilly toward a poor lady who the world lost too early. linda mccartney, from all accounts, was a beloved and wonderful woman. i don't doubt it. i think, though, that this overly treacly account of her life is making me want to hurl.
or maybe i'm just jealous 😉